![]() Enjoy a flawless experience and enjoy the quality of porn in a crystal clear HD image. And in addition, the site also has a great player which will help you stream your favorite videos in no time. Top content from the major studios and some of the greatest sex models online. Its pages are packed with smashing videos. And even though you might prefer something else rather than straight content, always be sure that you will find it in here. That's because the page is packed with the newest porn in the industry. Sign up here.No matter your kink or your sexuality, surfing will surely grant you a wonderful time. The Opinion newsletter is a weekly wrap of views that will challenge, champion and inform your own. ![]() All they have on their side is the public sentiment that there has been an overreaction and that if their senior managers have been watching them on OnlyFans, it’s probably not the public who need protecting, it’s the nurses themselves. That’s not a protection the allegedly naughty nurses can claim either. In 2019, the Federal Circuit Court overruled James Cook University’s action in sacking a physics professor, Peter Ridd, for criticising colleagues, saying that as an academic he had a right to intellectual freedom. As the nurses and midwives have found, the sackable offence doesn’t even have to be real. ![]() Israel Folau, most notably, lost his rugby contract in 2019 after posting online that God would send gay people to hell. Three years later, Angela Williamson lost her job at Cricket Australia for online comments about abortion law in Tasmania. SBS’s Scott McIntyre lost his job in 2015 for tweeting negatively about Anzac Day. And when gaps open up, the common law, as read by the courts, is frequently read in the employers’ favour. Codes of conduct, broader in interpretation, extend these powers further. Her comments were posted anonymously and in her own time, but that didn’t protect her.Įmployment contracts have been on the creep for the past decade, specifically requiring that employees not undermine or bring into disrepute the organisation they work for, even when they’re on their own time. In 2018, federal immigration bureaucrat Michaela Banerji lost her case in the High Court after being dismissed for tweeting comments criticising the department’s policy in 2013. ![]() In 2011, Fair Work Australia upheld the sacking of a Good Guys employee who criticised the company’s payroll department on his Facebook page, saying his criticism amounted to a “threat” against a colleague. And if you’ve put the information out into the public, you can’t then claim that your privacy has been invaded (unless your name is Harry or Meghan).Įmployment law has moved in the opposite direction from public sentiment. But the federal Privacy Act, which is currently under review, and state acts are more concerned with data protection than stopping your bosses from poking their noses into your business. (They would be in even bigger trouble for showing images of themselves cleaning bedpans, which would be employer property.)Ī full page ad supporting Israel Folau in the Daily Telegraph, paid for by the Australian Christian Lobby.Ī 2020 survey for the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner found 83 per cent of Australians want more protections for their privacy. More likely, they were posting intimate images. According to Gan’s definition, OnlyFans is not just about home-made porn and the nurses might well have been posting videos of themselves cleaning out bedpans. Unfortunately, according to reports received by the Nursing and Midwifery Council, their “exclusive community” in this case could have included patients, colleagues and others in the hospital system. If there were nurses posting, according to OnlyFans CEO Amrapali Gan, they were doing so on “a safe, content-inclusive platform that allows people to share and monetise content exclusively with their community”. One of the COVID pandemic’s big winners, OnlyFans has generated some $17.4 billion in revenue from viewers paying “tips” for intimate material they see. OnlyFans is not exactly a porn site, but that’s what almost all of its 120 million users think it is.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |